Hello, Yesterday I was uploading this code. I read a bit of the library documentation and review the code more detailed (because at first I only looked at it very roughly) and my conclusions were exactly the same as your answer so I left the 1001 Ethercat Address. At first I didn't see that below there is increment of this variable and that it is working in a loop and checking all addresses as you said. I will keep you updated about the situation. As far as I know the problem was still present for the last time. Now we will try with the program which Dias wrote and check if it is better ;). Thanks for your answer and have a nice day!
... View more
