FORUM CTRLX AUTOMATION
ctrlX World Partner Apps for ctrlX AUTOMATION
Dear Community User! We have started the migration process.
This community is now in READ ONLY mode.
Read more: Important
information on the platform change.
11-17-2022 02:34 PM - last edited on 11-18-2022 09:36 AM by HmiGuide
In an Indralogic project we have a union of DWORD and a 32 element structure of type BIT. For example:
TYPE UN_CONTROL :
UNION
Word : WORD;
Bits : ST_CTRL_BITS;
END_UNION
END_TYPE
TYPE ST_CTRL_BITS:
STRUCT
b0 : BIT;
b1 : BIT;
...
...
b31 : BIT;
END_STRUCT
END_TYPE;
We have this because some legacy HMI used words to communicate, but within the PLC itself it is nice to be able to address variables as control.bits.b<whatever name>.
This works within indralogic, no problem. The trouble is, when trying to access this word via OPC-UA (UA-client, Web-IQ, etc) it neither appears as the bits or the word, it is like it has completely dissappeared.
I know I could re-write the code to switch between WORDs and, say, a BOOL structure, but I was hoping to find a neater solution utilising the UNION. Any suggestions?
p.s. in an integration with a 3rd-party (UniOP device), I shared the XML schema and XML file with the project variables, and the developer could read and manipulate the BIT!
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-17-2022 03:56 PM
This sounds to me more like an issue with Indralogic than with WebIQ. I understand that you're not even seeing the item in UA Expert, is that correct?
11-17-2022 05:44 PM
Hi, yes you are quite right. Now that I explore further it seems any UNION is not visible.
I guess I could move this on to another forum.
11-18-2022 07:39 AM
Moved this thread from Smart HMI - WebIQ Designer and Server to Communication forum.
11-18-2022 07:52 AM - edited 11-18-2022 11:28 AM
Could you please give us some more information about your project?
We are at the moment working on a feature for the access to complete structures via OPCUA. And also the access to the data type BIT is in preparation.
11-21-2022 11:29 AM - edited 11-30-2022 11:06 AM
I tested it with LTE version ctrlX 1.12.9 and it works like expected. What I wonder, that you have only a WORD variable (16 bit).
There are 2 ways how to use unions:
1. Use identical RAM by storing different data types/value types in the same place. => You must store somewhere the info how to interprete the address in the RAM:
2. Use BIT's instead of BOOL's
3. Combination of 1 + 2
When I read your request you are using option 3.
This means in the
TYPE UN_CONTROL :
UNION
dwValue: DWORD; // must be DWORD to access all 32 bits of variable Bits
Bits: ST_CTRL_BITS;
END_UNION
END_TYPE
The structure ST_CTRL_BITS is not a standard data type, therefore it is visible in OpcUA browse but with unknown (=empty) data type. Therefore you can not access it.
You can access the bits via the union variable Word, but you must adapt the data type to DWORD, to access all 32 bits of the union variable Bits. To access bits in WebIQ you add a prefix to the item: bit[bitNo]:item e.g. bit[0]:SInt
11-30-2022 10:14 AM
@HmiGuide , you assume correctly. I apologise for my typo in the OP (I didn't copy from live code), but my actual code is size-matched. I have tried WORD and 16-bit structures; DWORD and 32-bit structures; WORD and INT (just to check it wasnt my bit structures), none of this works.
I should add though, @CodeShepherd , this is an MLC75 running IW14v22 rather than a CtrlX processor. And although I originally brought this up in a WebIQ forum, it seems even the UA-Client cannot read this data. So it suggests the issue lies in MLC/IW platform, perhaps the OPCUA server.
11-30-2022 11:05 AM - edited 11-30-2022 11:07 AM
@NickOS in the MLC version you are using there is an older CoDeSys version than in ctrlX.
There is an easy workaround to access the variable. Just add a refence which points to your structure. I tested it with IW 14V22 P5.
VAR_GLOBAL
stTest: UN_CONTROL;
// reference MUST be initialized to export it into symbol file
refDWord: REFERENCE TO DWORD REF= stTest.dwValue;
END_VAR
11-30-2022 11:30 AM
Thanks @HmiGuide , I think I can work with that for now.