FORUM CTRLX AUTOMATION
ctrlX World Partner Apps for ctrlX AUTOMATION
- About osamaayoub
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
About osamaayoub
since
07-21-2022
03-09-2023
osamaayoub
Established Member
13
Posts
1
Likes
2
Solutions
03-09-2023
12:47 PM
Thank you for your replies, I was able to solve it by creating a bridge between the network adapters of the virtual cores using windows and then started the controllers throught the command line then the controllers were able to ping each other and exchange information normally. Thanks again!
... View more
02-23-2023
09:34 AM
Hello, I am trying to run two virtual cores on the same machine to run some applications inside each one of them, my applications need to be able to connect to the other virtual core. I checked and it seems that the virtual cores can't ping each other. I am running ctrlX WORKS on windows machine, controller1 with IP 192.168.1.1, controller2 with IP 192.168.1.2, I checked the external access options in port forwarding, but it will make both controllers use the same IP, I need each one to have its own IP as if I am running two actual controllers, is that possible? My windows machine can ping both controllers, but they can't ping each other. Regards, Osama
... View more
10-11-2022
01:38 PM
One last thing, the line of code that I changed is actually from the samples-cpp allDataProvider, I don't know if it is left like this intentionally or not, but I would suggest to add a comment there so no one would have such an issue later 🙂
... View more
10-11-2022
12:23 PM
1 Like
Hello again,
I discovered the main reason behind the problem which is: The _addressBase is not being added correctly when I go deeper in the structure because of this line in RegisterNodes function
result = _provider->registerNode(_addressBase + "**", this);
So I changed it to:
result = _provider->registerNode(_addressBase , this);
To update the address base and get the metaData correctly when I have a deep structure.
Thank you so much for your help, it lead me to look deeper into onMetaData() which solved the problem for me.
Cheers,
Osama
... View more
10-11-2022
11:46 AM
Thank you for your reply it is indeed helpful, I would prefer to use the first method without involving .csv files. Shouldn't the function: comm::datalayer::Variant ProviderNodeAllData::createMetadata(const comm::datalayer::Variant &data, const std::string &address) Shouldn't it take care of creating the metadata by itself? I can see that it is called when a new ProviderNodeAllData object is created. I can also see inside createMetadata that it detect that the node parent1 is a folder class which is "7" and when it runs everything goes just fine. If I should use onMetadata() manually, is there something similar in the samples that I missed?
... View more
Latest Tags
No tags yet
OK
OK